What Kazakhstan’s 2025 Interest Rate Cap Means for Consumer Credit Investors

Introduction

Kazakhstan’s financial regulators have significantly tightened the cap on interest rates for consumer loans in 2025, aiming to curb predatory lending and household over-indebtedness.

Regulatory Action and Authorities Involved

• A joint resolution by the Agency for Regulation and Development of the Financial Market (ARDFM) and the National Bank of Kazakhstan (NBK)
• Introduced lower maximum annual effective interest rates (AEIR) for loans
• Effective June 16, 2025

Scope of the Interest Rate Cap

1. The effective APR calculation must include all associated costs:
   
   • Interest
   • Fees
   • Insurance premiums
2. Ensuring lenders cannot sidestep the cap by tacking on extra charges

Implications for Investors

For investors in Kazakhstan’s consumer finance sector:

• These regulatory changes mark a new era of stricter compliance
• Potentially lower yields
• High-rate lending models are forced to reform

Regulatory Changes: Interest Rate Caps and Effective APR Definitions (2025)

In mid-2025, Kazakhstan reduced the ceiling on interest rates for both bank and non-bank consumer loans.

The maximum annual effective interest rate (AEIR) for unsecured loans (whether issued by banks or microfinance organisations (MFOs)) was lowered from the longstanding 56% to 46% per annum.

This cap applies to the full cost of credit on a yearly basis.

What the AEIR Must Include

Regulators explicitly require that the AEIR reflect all payment obligations of the borrower, including:

• Interest
• Fees and commissions
• Insurance payments tied to the loan

As a result, lenders must factor in ancillary charges such as loan origination fees or credit insurance when computing the effective interest rate.

This prevents lenders from disguising the true cost of borrowing by separating additional charges from the stated interest rate.

Stricter Limits for Short-Term Microloans

For short-term microloans, even tighter restrictions were affirmed. These loans are defined as:

• Small loans of up to approximately 45 monthly calculation indices (MCI) in amount (a few hundred dollars)
• A maximum duration of 45 days

For these payday-style loans:

• The AEIR must not exceed 0.3% per day (approximately 9% per month)
• An absolute annualised cap of 179% applies if the loan is extended over a year

These measures build upon earlier rules introduced between 2019 and 2020, which had already capped ultra-short loans at around a 30% charge for the loan period.

By tightening the limits further in 2025, authorities signalled that extremely high-interest “payday” loans have no place in the regulated market.

The intention is to make borrowing costs more transparent and affordable, especially in the microcredit segment that serves vulnerable consumers.

Motivation: Curbing Debt Risks and Protecting Consumers

Kazakhstan’s push to enforce lower interest rate caps is rooted in consumer protection concerns and a broader effort to rein in household debt growth.

In recent years, unsecured consumer lending and MFO-issued microloans expanded rapidly, often at exorbitant interest rates that trapped borrowers in recurring debt cycles.

Reducing Debt Burdens Through Regulation

By capping the AEIR at 46% and mandating clear disclosure of the total loan cost, regulators aimed to:

• Reduce the burden of excessive debt on borrowers
• Promote more responsible lending practices

The Agency for Regulation and Development of the Financial Market (ARDFM) and the National Bank of Kazakhstan (NBK) have placed strong emphasis on transparency.

Lenders are required to present key loan terms upfront in standard formats so borrowers clearly understand the true cost of credit.

These required disclosures include:

1. Interest rates
2. Fees and commissions
3. Total repayment amount

Alignment With International Best Practices

Officials also viewed these measures as aligning Kazakhstan’s financial practices with international best practices. Madina Abylkassymova, the ARDFM Chairwoman, noted that rigidly high interest rates on unsecured loans were unsustainable.

She noted that future updates to the maximum Annual Percentage Rate (APR) calculation methodologies would be implemented to better incorporate market conditions and underlying risk levels.

Forward-Looking Regulatory Signals

By late 2025, regulators were even considering further reductions to the rate cap, discussing a possible 44-45% limit if inflation and market rates continued to ease.

The broader policy goal is a healthier credit market where:

• Consumers can access credit at a reasonable cost
• Lenders compete on service quality and risk management rather than by pushing sky-high interest

For investors, this underscores that regulatory risk in the form of sudden interest caps is a key factor in Kazakhstan’s consumer finance landscape - a trade-off intended to stabilise the market over the long term at the expense of short-term profitability for lenders.

Enforcement Actions: No Tolerance for Non-Compliance

In 2025, regulators matched the introduction of tighter interest rate caps with vigorous enforcement, signalling that breaches would be met with meaningful penalties.

The Agency for Regulation and Development of the Financial Market (ARDFM) conducted checks and issued directives to banks and microfinance organisations (MFOs), requiring all loan products to be adjusted to the 46% AEIR cap (or lower) by the June 2025 effective date.

Regulatory Inspections and License Suspensions

As part of this enforcement push:

• The ARDFM reviewed loan products across banks and MFOs to ensure compliance with the revised AEIR limits.
• Multiple microfinance organisations saw their licenses temporarily suspended after failing to comply with regulatory orders.

In late 2024 and into 2025, at least five MFOs had their operating licenses paused for three months due to a “failure to fulfill the written order of the regulator.”

This effectively halted their ability to issue new loans. Affected firms included Hava Finance and Express Zaim.

These actions made it clear that workarounds such as hidden fees or any overshoot of the interest cap would not be tolerated.

High-Profile Case: Robocash.kz

One of the most notable enforcement cases involved MFO Robocash.kz, a prominent online lender.

In October 2025, the ARDFM temporarily suspended Robocash’s microfinance license after identifying regulatory violations.

As a result:

• The company was barred from issuing new loans for a two-month period.
• Fitch Ratings placed Robocash on Rating Watch Negative, putting immediate pressure on its credit profile.

While specific reasons for the suspension were not publicly detailed, industry observers noted that the action coincided with the post-cap regulatory environment.

This suggested potential issues such as exceeding the AEIR limit or other compliance failures.

Robocash resumed lending by late 2025 after reportedly rectifying the issues.

However, the episode sent a clear message:

lenders must strictly adhere to the 46% AEIR cap, including all add-on charges, or risk losing their ability to operate.

Implications for Investors

For investors, these enforcement cases underscore the regulatory rigor in Kazakhstan’s consumer finance market.

Even fast-growing, foreign-backed fintech lenders can be swiftly shut down if they fall afoul of consumer protection rules, reinforcing that regulatory compliance is a critical investment risk factor.

Impact on the Consumer Lending Market

Margin Pressure and Slower Growth

The enforcement of interest rate caps is materially reshaping Kazakhstan’s consumer and microloan market.

Profit margins on unsecured lending are being squeezed, as many lenders historically charged well above 46% once fees were included.

Fitch Ratings has noted that these caps, together with other prudential tightening measures, will likely slow consumer lending growth in Kazakhstan.

This marks a clear deceleration from the previously rapid expansion of microcredit portfolios.

Several structural pressures are converging on lenders:

1. Higher inflation
2. Rising funding costs
3. A hard interest rate ceiling that limits cost pass-through to borrowers

According to Fitch, non-bank financial institutions (NBFIs) now face sustained margin pressure and must adjust their business models accordingly.

Typical responses include:

• Cutting back on riskier lending segments that are no longer profitable under the cap
• Improving operational efficiency
• Seeking lower-cost funding sources to compensate for reduced yields

Industry Consolidation and Business Model Shifts

The regulatory changes are expected to accelerate consolidation across the consumer lending industry.

Smaller or less efficient microfinance organisations (MFOs) that cannot operate sustainably under a 46% AEIR cap may exit the market or merge with competitors.

In contrast, larger players with strong capitalisation and technology-driven cost advantages are better positioned to survive and adapt.

Fitch highlighted a growing divergence:

• Firms with robust business models and solid profitability should remain creditworthy despite the cap
• Weaker players are more likely to struggle under the new constraints

At the same time, there is a noticeable trend of microfinance companies seeking to obtain banking licenses.

This move allows lenders to:

• Access cheaper funding through deposits
• Diversify their product mix beyond microloans

While banks are also subject to the same 46% cap on unsecured loans, this shift reflects broader efforts by lenders to remain competitive within the tightened regulatory framework.

Overall, the market is likely to experience a shake-out in which only the most efficient and compliant lenders thrive.

Effects on Borrowers and Credit Access

From a borrower’s perspective, the regulatory changes are expected to gradually reduce borrowing costs and the prevalence of debt traps.

Prior to the cap, it was not uncommon for payday loans to carry effective APRs in the triple or even quadruple digits once all fees were accounted for.

With an all-in APR limit now enforced, consumers are expected to pay less over the life of a loan.

Predatory lending models are effectively outlawed.

Over time, this could lead to:

1. Improved repayment outcomes
2. Lower default rates, as loans become more affordable relative to borrowers’ incomes

However, the changes also introduce trade-offs.

If lenders cannot price loans above 46% to offset higher default risk, they may respond by:

• Tightening approval criteria
• Reducing access to credit for the riskiest borrowers

As a result, some marginal borrowers may find it harder to obtain credit at all - a common consequence when interest rate caps are imposed in any market.

Companies in the Spotlight: Robocash, Moneyman, and Others

Online Microloan Lenders Under Pressure

Among non-bank lenders, online microloan companies are the most affected by interest rate cap enforcement.

These firms, both local and internationally backed, built their business models around short-term, high-APR lending.

The 46% APR cap directly challenges this approach and has forced a reassessment of growth and profitability expectations.

Robocash.kz

Robocash.kz is a prominent example.

Part of a Singapore-based fintech group, it was known for instant short-term loans and attractive returns for P2P investors funding those loans.

The 46% APR cap, combined with heightened regulatory scrutiny, has directly undermined this model.

Key developments include:

• In July 2025, Fitch Ratings assigned Robocash.kz its first credit rating.
• Fitch explicitly cited “considerable regulatory risk” in Kazakhstan.
• Interest rate caps revised in 2024 were noted as pressuring the company’s business profile.
• In October 2025, Robocash’s microfinance license was temporarily suspended, demonstrating that the regulatory risk had materialised.

Robocash reportedly fulfilled all obligations to investors during the suspension.

However, its growth ambitions in Kazakhstan are now constrained by the need to operate strictly within the new limits.

Investors previously attracted by high-yield loan portfolios must now accept that future yields will be lower under the capped regime, albeit potentially accompanied by lower default risk as borrowers are less over-extended.

Moneyman.kz

Another major player is Moneyman.kz, operated by MFO “FinTechFinance” in Kazakhstan.

Historically, Moneyman offered payday-style loans such as 5-30 day microcredits of a few hundred thousand tenge (a few hundred USD) to individuals.

Due to their short duration, these loans often carried high fees and interest.

Under the new rules:

• Pricing models had to be adjusted drastically.
• Charging rates equivalent to around 1% per day (approximately 365% APR) is no longer possible.
• The applicable cap for such loans is now 0.3% per day.

As of late 2025, no public regulatory action had been taken against Moneyman.

Nevertheless, its revenue potential and growth outlook are clearly constrained.

Like other online lenders, it may attempt to compensate by increasing loan volumes or shifting toward longer-term installment loans priced at the cap.

Competition and stricter underwriting standards, however, could limit these strategies.

For investors, this signals a clear shift: the explosive returns once generated by payday lenders are moderating.

The emphasis moves away from pricing power toward volume growth, cost control, and operational efficiency.

Other Lenders Facing Similar Constraints

Beyond Robocash and Moneyman, several other local and regional lenders face comparable pressures.

These include:

1. Vivus.kz (part of the international 4Finance group)
2. CreditPlus
3. Konga
4. Solo (Kazakhstan)

These fintech MFOs built their customer bases around quick, small loans that often relied on high fees.

All must now operate within the 46% APR boundary, which is likely to compress margins.

Even traditional microfinance institutions are affected.

KMF (KazMicroFinance), the country’s largest MFI serving micro-entrepreneurs, must ensure its effective rates (including commissions) remain under the cap for unsecured loans.

While KMF’s average rates were already near previous limits, its ability to price for risk on higher-risk clients is now more constrained.

Closing Loopholes and Market Outlook

There is anecdotal evidence that some lenders attempted to introduce membership fees or insurance products as a way to charge extra for credit-related services.

Regulators have clarified that if such payments are a condition of obtaining a loan, they must be included in the AEIR calculation and therefore fall under the cap.

This clarification has effectively closed off meaningful loopholes.

Going forward, the likely winners in Kazakhstan’s consumer finance market will be lenders that can:

• Operate efficiently at or below a 46% APR
• Achieve profitability through scale or lower cost of capital

Those that depended on triple-digit effective rates will be forced to transform their business models or exit the market altogether.

Outlook and Regional Context

Kazakhstan’s Regulatory Stance in a Regional Comparison

Kazakhstan’s strict enforcement of interest rate caps in 2025 represents a bold stance in a region where approaches to microloan regulation vary widely.

Neighboring Uzbekistan, for example, has no statutory caps on microloan interest rates.

This lack of limits has raised concerns about consumer debt stress in that market.

By contrast, Kazakhstan has a long history of interventionist consumer protection:

• A 56% AEIR cap was in place for several years before being lowered to 46%.
• Certain fees have been explicitly banned.
• Effective APR calculations have been tightly defined and enforced.

This pro-consumer regulatory tilt is likely to persist.

Expected Regulatory Direction

Looking ahead, the Agency for Regulation and Development of the Financial Market (ARDFM) has signalled further reforms.

Announced measures for 2026 include potentially ending the practice of fixed nominal rates on consumer loans and moving toward more risk-based pricing models.

Importantly, any such changes would still operate within a regulated maximum APR framework.

There is also the possibility of more differentiated caps, depending on loan type or size.

This approach already exists in parts of the market, such as:

1. Mortgages capped at 20% AEIR
2. Secured loans capped at 35% AEIR

Any additional reduction in the unsecured loan cap, for example, from 46% toward approximately 40%, would depend on broader macroeconomic conditions.

Key factors include inflation trends and base interest rates falling to levels that still allow lenders to operate viably.

Implications for Investors and Creditors

For investors and creditors, Kazakhstan’s experience in 2025 underscores the importance of incorporating regulatory risk into risk-return calculations.

Private credit and microloan portfolios in Kazakhstan historically offered attractive returns, often exceeding 20% net yield.

Under the new capped regime, those returns are trending lower.

At the same time, risk dynamics may be improving:

• Borrowers are less burdened by excessive debt.
• Default rates could improve over time.
• Overall portfolio stability may increase.

Credible enforcement by regulators can also be viewed as supportive of long-term market sustainability.

This may help attract larger-scale institutional investment, even if returns are capped at lower levels.

Some investors may shift attention to neighbouring markets with looser regulation, such as Uzbekistan, in search of higher yields.

However, doing so involves accepting higher default risk and greater political and regulatory uncertainty.

Kazakhstan’s approach ultimately reflects a deliberate trade-off: sacrificing some growth and profit potential in exchange for stronger consumer protection and financial stability.

Conclusion

A Pivotal Shift in 2025

The year 2025 marked a pivotal shift in Kazakhstan’s consumer lending landscape.

The enforcement of a 46% effective interest rate cap, inclusive of all fees and insurance, has compelled lenders to overhaul their products and strategies.

Short-Term Pressure, Long-Term Intent

This development has squeezed short-term profits for lenders and, by extension, reduced returns for investors exposed to these loan portfolios.

At the same time, the policy is clearly aimed at fostering a healthier credit ecosystem characterised by transparent pricing and fewer debt traps for borrowers.

Industry Impact and Market Evolution

Key industry players such as Robocash.kz and Moneyman.kz have already felt the strain of the new regulatory environment.

More broadly, the microfinance sector is entering a phase of consolidation and structural evolution as weaker or less adaptable lenders are forced to exit or merge.

What This Means for Investors

For investors, Kazakhstan’s tighter regulatory regime requires:

1. Adjusting return expectations
2. Strengthening diligence and risk assessment practices

However, the new framework also offers a more predictable operating environment, where the most extreme forms of predatory lending are actively constrained.

Looking Ahead

Going forward, market participants will closely monitor how effectively lenders adapt to this new normal.

A central question remains whether Kazakhstan can strike the right balance between protecting borrowers and maintaining a vibrant, inclusive consumer credit market under close regulatory oversight.

Sources

1. Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Regulation and Development of the Financial Market (ARDFM).
   “О приостановлении действия лицензии МФО.” [On the suspension of an MFO license] Gov.kz, June 4, 2025.
   https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/ardfm/press/news/details/1012949?lang=ru
2. Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan for Regulation and Development of the Financial Market (ARDFM).
   “О приостановлении действия лицензии ТОО «Микрофинансовая организация «Экспресс Займ».” [On the suspension of the license of MFO ‘Express Zaim’ LLC] Gov.kz, May 14, 2024.
   https://www.gov.kz/memleket/entities/ardfm/press/news/details/770218?lang=ru
3. Agency for Regulation and Development of the Financial Market of the Republic of Kazakhstan, and National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
   “Совместное постановление Правления Агентства Республики Казахстан по регулированию и развитию финансового рынка от 30 апреля 2025 года № 13 и постановление Правления Национального Банка Республики Казахстан от 22 мая 2025 года № 27 «О внесении изменения в совместное постановление … ‘Об определении предельных размеров годовой эффективной ставки вознаграждения’».” [Joint resolution amending maximum AEIR limits] Online.zakon.kz, April 30, 2025 / May 22, 2025.
   https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=33940180
4. F-Chain.
   “Kazakhstan Sets New Caps on Annual Effective Interest Rates.” F-Chain, June 13, 2025.
   https://f-chain.com/kazakhstan-sets-new-caps-on-annual-effective-interest-rates/
5. F-Chain.
   “Key Changes in Kazakhstan’s Financial Legislation.” F-Chain, 2025.
   https://f-chain.com/key-changes-in-kazakhstans-financial-legislation/
6. Fitch Ratings.
   “Fitch Assigns LLP ‘MFO Robocash.kz’ First-Time ‘B’ Rating; Outlook Stable.” Fitch Ratings, July 25, 2025.
   https://www.fitchratings.com/research/non-bank-financial-institutions/fitch-assigns-llp-mfo-robocashkz-first-time-b-rating-outlook-stable-25-07-2025
7. Fitch Ratings.
   “Fitch Places Robocash ‘B+’ Long-Term IDR on Rating Watch Negative.” Fitch Ratings, October 16, 2025.
   https://www.fitchratings.com/research/non-bank-financial-institutions/fitch-places-robocash-b-long-term-idr-on-rating-watch-negative-16-10-2025
8. Fitch Ratings.
   “Rates and Regulation to Slow Kazakh and Uzbek NBFI Growth.” Fitch Ratings, October 23, 2025.
   https://www.fitchratings.com/research/international-public-finance/rates-regulation-to-slow-kazakh-uzbek-nbfi-growth-23-10-2025
9. Forbes Kazakhstan.
   “В Казахстане предлагают снизить предельную ставку по ипотеке.” [Proposal to lower mortgage rate caps in Kazakhstan] Forbes.kz, March 6, 2025.
   https://forbes.kz/articles/v-kazahstane-predlagayut-snizit-predelnuyu-stavku-po-ipoteke-f58d98
10. Kazakhstan Stock Exchange (KASE).
    “Robokash.kz suspends microloan issuance for two months.” Market and Company News, September 30, 2025.
    https://kase.kz/en/information/news/show/1552005
11. Kazakhstan Stock Exchange (KASE).
    “MFO ‘Robocash.kz’ resumes microlending.” Market and Company News, December 2, 2025.
    https://kase.kz/en/information/news/show/1556204
12. Kazakhstan Stock Exchange (KASE).
    “Trading in bonds KZ2P00010291 (MFRCb1) of Robokash.kz will resume on KASE on December 3.” Market and Company News, December 2, 2025.
    https://kase.kz/en/information/news/show/1556250
13. Kilde.
    “Non-Bank Financial Institutions & Private Credit in Uzbekistan.” Kilde, 2025.
    https://www.kilde.sg/post/non-bank-financial-institutions-and-private-credit-investment-in-uzbekistan
14. Republic of Kazakhstan.
    “Закон Республики Казахстан от 30 июня 2025 года № 205-VIII «О внесении изменений и дополнений в некоторые законодательные акты Республики Казахстан по вопросам развития финансового рынка, защиты прав потребителей финансовых услуг, связи и исключения излишней законодательной регламентации».” [Law amending financial market and consumer protection legislation] Online.zakon.kz, June 30, 2025.
    https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=32587017
15. Trend.Az.
    “Kazakhstan introduces measures to support business and reduce household debt.” Trend.Az, November 19, 2025.
    https://www.trend.az/casia/kazakhstan/4119487.html
16. Учёт.kz.
    “Определены предельные размеры годовой эффективной ставки вознаграждения.” [Maximum AEIR limits defined] Учёт.kz, June 17, 2025.
    https://uchet.kz/news/opredeleny-predelnye-razmery-godovoy-effektivnoy-stavki-voznagrazhdeniya/
17. Zakon.kz.
    “Банковские комиссии и ставки вознаграждения по кредитам: внесены изменения.” [Amendments to bank fees and lending rates] Zakon.kz, October 8, 2025.
    https://www.zakon.kz/pravo/6493545-bankovskie-komissii-i-stavki-voznagrazhdeniya-po-kreditam-vneseny-izmeneniya.html
18. Zakon.uchet.kz (Information and Legal System of Regulatory Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan).
    “Постановление Правления Агентства Республики Казахстан по регулированию и развитию финансового рынка от 29 сентября 2025 года № 64 … (зарегистрировано 1 октября 2025 года № 37026).” [ARDFM board resolution on lending regulation] Zakon.uchet.kz, September 29, 2025.
    https://zakon.uchet.kz/rus/history/V2500037026/29.09.2025
19. Учёт.kz.
    “Казахстанцы смогут проверить реальную стоимость кредита онлайн — банки обязали раскрывать все комиссии.” [Banks required to disclose full loan costs online] Учёт.kz, October 8, 2025.
    https://uchet.kz/news/kazakhstantsy-smogut-proverit-realnuyu-stoimost-kredita-onlayn-banki-obyazali-raskryvat-vse-komissii/

_{Disclaimer Notice}

_{This page is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, or investment advice. Please refer to our Full Disclaimer for important details regarding eligibility, risks, and the limited scope of our services.}