India's Non-Bank Lending and Private Credit: A Comprehensive Analysis

India's Private Credit Landscape

India is the largest non-bank lending market that most global private credit investors still do not own directly. In February 2026 that stopped being a structural problem and became a choice.

Role of Non-Bank Financial Institutions (NBFCs)

• NBFC-ICCs — investment and credit companies; the core of the sector, from conglomerate lenders to regional specialists
• NBFC-MFIs — microfinance lenders; 44.2% of India's microcredit
• Housing finance companies (HFCs) — RBI-regulated since 2019
• Gold-loan NBFCs — the fastest-growing segment in the market
• Fintech-partnered NBFCs — app-first origination under the Digital Lending Directions, 2025

None may take demand deposits. Every rupee they lend is wholesale-funded — which is precisely why they need private credit.

A note on units and periods. Indian sources report these figures in lakh crore and crore, using Indian digit grouping. This report converts throughout to trillion, billion and million, with USD equivalents at approximately ₹94/USD. For cross-reference: ₹1 lakh crore = ₹1 trillion, and ₹1 crore = ₹10 million. India's fiscal year runs 1 April to 31 March, so FY26 means the year ended 31 March 2026 and FY27 the year ending 31 March 2027. Where a source reports on a calendar-year basis this is marked CY — private credit deal data below is CY, while banking, NBFC and securitisation data is FY. The two are offset by one quarter and should not be read as covering the same window.

Focus of This Report

1. India's macro backdrop and the FX overlay that decides realised returns.
2. Where non-banks actually win, and the segments that matter.
3. The regulatory framework — including the reforms that reshaped foreign access in 2026.
4. The funding stack of an Indian NBFC and what each source signals.
5. Risks, opportunities and entry routes for private credit investors.

Key Takeaways

• NBFC AUM is ₹48–50 trillion (~USD 510–530 billion), around 18–19% of systemic credit, crossing ₹50 trillion by March 2027.
• The 2026 ECB overhaul removed the all-in-cost cap entirely and opened lender eligibility to any non-resident. Offshore lending into Indian NBFCs is now a commercial negotiation.
• ICRA puts the retail NBFC segment's incremental funding need at ₹4.1–4.3 trillion (~USD 44–46 billion) in FY27. Incremental bank credit into that segment was only ~₹40 billion across the first eight months of FY26.
• FX is the dominant risk, but hedging is unusually cheap — the 12-month forward premium sits at ~2.8–3.0%.

The Big Picture: India's Macro and Credit Overview (FY25–FY27)

Economic Growth

• FY26 real GDP grew 7.7% (provisional, 5 June 2026), up from 7.1% in FY25 — the fastest of any major economy.
• Domestically driven: gross fixed capital formation +8.2% (Q4 at a thirteen-quarter high of 10.8%), private consumption +7.7%, services ~+11%, manufacturing in double digits.
• Agriculture lagged at 3.0% — which is why rural-facing lenders recovered more slowly than the rest of the market.
• The NSO rebased national accounts to 2022-23 in February 2026, so longer back-series are not directly comparable.
• FY27 is the turn. In June 2026 the RBI cut its FY27 growth forecast to 6.6% (from 6.9%) and raised FY27 inflation to 5.1% (from 4.6%).

Table 1 — Core Macroeconomic Indicators: India

Sources: NSO/MoSPI provisional estimates FY 2025-26; RBI Monetary Policy Statements, October 2025 and June 2026.

Inflation and Interest Rates

1. FY26 disinflation was extraordinary — headline CPI fell for nine consecutive months to an eight-year low of 1.6% in July 2025, on the longest food-price decline in the CPI series.
2. GST rationalisation from 22 September 2025 directly touched ~11.4% of the CPI basket.
3. Policy response: 125 bps of cuts between February 2025 and February 2026, taking the repo rate to 5.25%.
4. That cycle is over — three consecutive holds through June 2026, neutral stance, FY27 inflation revised up on energy costs and the Middle East conflict.

Investor implication: NBFCs entered FY27 with a falling cost of funds — ICRA expected weighted average CoF to fall 10–30 bps in FY26 and again in FY27. If the cycle turns, that tailwind reverses for fixed-rate, long-tenor lenders. Floating-rate and short-duration books are better positioned.

The External Position — Where the Real Risk Sits

Table 2 — External and FX Snapshot (2026)

Sources: RBI Monetary Policy Statements and State of the Economy reports 2026; PIB releases; market forward-premium data, July 2026.

Interpretation for investors. One line is doing all the work. The 12-month forward premium compressed to ~2.8–3.0% as the US–India rate differential narrowed and the RBI became active in 12–18 month swap tenors; one-year hedging costs fell from ~3.50% to ~2.92% ahead of the June 2026 policy.

A lender writing an INR facility at 13% can currently hedge back to USD for about 3 percentage points, against 4.5–5.5% two years ago. The FX overlay on Indian credit is cheaper than it has been for most of the last decade — and that, more than any change in gross yield, is what re-rated India for offshore private credit. Forward premia can reverse quickly; model hedging cost as a variable and stress-test it at 5%.

What Makes India Structurally Different

Structure and Size of the Non-Bank Sector

Banks Are Unusually Healthy — and That Cuts Both Ways

• Gross non-performing assets (GNPA) at scheduled commercial banks fell to 1.8% in March 2026, a multi-decadal low. Capital adequacy (CRAR) was 17.7% and common equity tier 1 15.3%, both multi-decade highs; the slippage ratio was 1.2%.
• RBI stress tests project bank GNPA at only 1.9% by March 2028 in the baseline, 3.8–4.1% under severe stress.
• Effect: healthy banks compete in prime segments and fund the rest. Both dynamics show up below.

Table 3 — NBFC Sector Scale and Trajectory

Sources: Crisil Ratings (November 2025); ICRA NBFC sector update (January 2026); RBI Financial Stability Report (June 2026).

Key takeaway. ICRA puts new funding demand from retail NBFCs alone — over and above refinancing — at roughly USD 44–46 billion in a single fiscal year, from a segment that cannot take deposits. Incremental bank supply into it over the first eight months of FY26 was ~₹40 billion — that is the change in exposure, not the stock, which remains large. The residual was met by market issuance and a record securitisation year. That gap is the private credit opportunity, stated arithmetically.

{{cta-component}}

Retail Credit: Composition Is Shifting

• System-wide retail credit AUM reached ₹137 trillion (~USD 1.46 trillion) in March 2026, +19% YoY, with ₹75 trillion of new loans originated in FY26, +31%. This covers all lender types — banks, NBFCs and small finance banks — not NBFCs alone.
• Consumption loans reached 51% of active borrowings, up from 34% in 2017; unsecured business loans went from 4% to ~21% — the fastest structural shift in Indian credit (TransUnion CIBIL).
• But FY26 tilted back to secured. Q4 FY26 originations rose 40% YoY by value (Equifax) and disbursements 42.2% (CRIF), led by gold.

Key Lending Segments

Table 4 — Segments at a Glance

Sources: Experian, CRIF High Mark "How India Lends" (May 2026), Equifax Q4 FY26, Crisil Ratings, MFIN Micrometer 57th edition.

Basis note: the gold, housing and microfinance figures are system-wide (all lender types, including banks); the vehicle figure is NBFC-only. Bureau figures also differ slightly by coverage and definition. Do not sum this column.

Two segments warrant detail, because they carry the market's defining opportunity and its defining cautionary tale.

1. Gold Loans — Fastest-Growing, Newly Standardised

Market scale

• System-wide gold-loan AUM ₹11.9 trillion, +47% YoY — the fastest-growing retail category.
• NBFC-only: Crisil expects gold-loan NBFC AUM to compound at ~40% across FY26–FY27, with return on assets holding at 4.25–4.5%.
• Branch productivity rose ~30% in the first nine months of FY26; average AUM per branch reached ~₹210 million (large players), ~₹115 million (mid-sized).
• Much of the growth is gold price appreciation, not volume — so LTV discipline is doing more work than origination.

Regulatory framework (key provisions effective 1 April 2026)

• Tiered loan-to-value (LTV): 85% up to ₹250,000 (~USD 2,650), 80% for ₹250,000–500,000, 75% above ₹500,000 — replacing a flat 75% cap.
• Bullet-repayment loans capped at 12 months, LTV computed on total repayment due at maturity, not disbursed amount.
• Uniform rules across banks, NBFCs and co-operatives; mandatory purity certification and standardised valuation.
• Collateral returned within seven working days; transparent auction procedures. Silver now accepted (10 kg ornaments, 500 g coins).

Kilde view: the most structurally protected high-yield asset class in Indian consumer finance — liquid collateral, short enforcement path, conservative and now uniform LTV. The genuine risk is not credit. It is a sharp gold price correction against a book written at 85% LTV, and that risk is correlated across the entire portfolio.

2. Microfinance — A Full Cycle, Completed in 24 Months

Dispersion, not the average, was the story. Spandana Sphoorty lost ₹10.4 billion (~USD 110 million) in FY25 and ₹7 billion in FY26, wrote off ₹11.6 billion, needed a ₹4 billion rights issue and breached covenants. Fusion Finance lost ₹12.2 billion (~USD 130 million) in FY25. Other lenders in the same states, under the same rules, stayed profitable throughout.

Where the sector stands now

• ~95% of exposure sits with borrowers linked to three or fewer lenders; ~66% of AUM is with repeat borrowers in cycle two or later, up from 53%.
• NBFC-MFIs raised ₹779 billion (~USD 8.3 billion) of debt in FY26, +30.9%.
• June 2025: RBI cut the NBFC-MFI qualifying-asset requirement from 75% to 60%, permitting far greater diversification into secured and individual lending.
• March 2026: CGSMFI-2.0 launched — a ₹200 billion (~USD 2.1 billion) government credit guarantee on bank lending to MFIs, extended to 31 August 2026, per-institution cap raised from ₹3 billion to ₹10 billion.

The underwriting lesson: under identical macro, identical regulation and an identical borrower base, outcomes ranged from profitability to a ₹12 billion loss. Nothing in the sector-level data predicted which was which. Counterparty selection was everything.

Regulatory Framework for Non-Bank Lenders

1. Overview

• Principal supervisor: the Reserve Bank of India, for prudential and conduct matters, under Chapter IIIB of the RBI Act, 1934. SEBI covers listed debt and fund vehicles.
• Self-regulatory organisations: MFIN and Sa-Dhan (microfinance), FACE (digital lending) — their codes carry practical force.
• No statutory APR cap on NBFC lending; microfinance rate caps were removed in March 2022. India runs no Spanish-style usury statute and no Kazakh-style hard ceiling.
• Discipline comes from elsewhere: affordability rules (a 50% cap on repayment outflows to monthly household income for microfinance borrowers), Key Facts Statement disclosure, board-approved and non-usurious pricing, and bureau-visible over-leverage.
• Deposits: NBFCs cannot accept demand deposits. Only NBFC-Ds may take term deposits, under strict conditions, and the RBI has been shrinking that category for years.
• Minimum net owned fund: ₹100 million for NBFC-ICC; ₹20 million for specialised categories (P2P, Account Aggregator).

2. Scale-Based Regulation — and the July 2026 Simplification

What changed on 1 July 2026: the RBI replaced the parametric scoring methodology (size, leverage, interconnectedness) with a single asset-size threshold of ₹1 trillion (~USD 10 billion) for Upper Layer identification, reviewed periodically. A June 2026 amendment exempted wholly government-owned NBFC-ULs from mandatory listing.

Investor implication: layer classification is the fastest diligence filter available on an Indian counterparty. It tells you the prudential regime, the disclosure regime, and — for Upper Layer entities — that listing and bank-equivalent governance obligations apply.

3. Product and Conduct Rules Introduced Since 2025

Two second-order effects worth noting. First, the added operational complexity of the co-lending rules pushed some originators away from co-lending toward direct assignment, feeding the securitisation surge below. Second, for any NBFC with a fintech origination partner, the LSP arrangement is now the highest-probability source of regulatory findings — review it as a first-order diligence item, not a schedule item.

4. Prudential Recalibration

Effect: the sequence illustrates the RBI's operating style — pre-emptive tightening when growth outruns underwriting, release when the data improves. State legislation is the wild card that sits outside this rulebook: the Karnataka and Tamil Nadu ordinances formally exempted RBI-regulated lenders but still chilled disbursement in those states. That is a risk which does not appear in the RBI rules and does not appear in bureau data until after it has hit the book.

The Single Most Important Variable for Foreign Lenders: The 2026 ECB Overhaul

On 9 February 2026 the RBI notified the Foreign Exchange Management (Borrowing and Lending) (First Amendment) Regulations, 2026, superseding the ECB provisions of the 2018 Regulations and 2019 Master Direction; reporting formats were revised by A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 23 of 18 February 2026. This is the most significant liberalisation of India's cross-border lending framework in over a decade.

Table 5 — ECB Framework: Before and After

Source: Foreign Exchange Management (Borrowing and Lending) (First Amendment) Regulations, 2026; A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 23, 18 February 2026.

What This Actually Changes

1. Pricing became a commercial negotiation. The old cost ceiling made high-yield offshore lending into India unworkable for exactly the mid-market borrowers who most needed it.
2. The lender universe widened sharply. Dropping the FATF/IOSCO residency test and the shareholding requirement for individuals opens routes previously closed to fund vehicles and family offices in a range of jurisdictions.
3. Three years is the operative constraint. The standardised MAMP is the main structural limitation; shorter working-capital-style facilities to non-manufacturing borrowers remain outside the route.
4. On-lending permission is decisive for NBFC exposure. A lender borrowing offshore in order to on-lend was previously constrained. That restriction is gone for non-prohibited purposes.

Important caveat: borrowers regulated by a financial sector regulator — which includes NBFCs — may additionally borrow per sector-specific guidelines. The general liberalisation does not automatically override sectoral treatment. Indian legal confirmation on the specific borrower category and end-use is a mandatory diligence step, not a formality.

The Portfolio Route Also Opened

Aggregate foreign investment in corporate bonds remains capped at 15% of outstanding stock, and unlisted bonds must be listed within prescribed timelines or redeemed.

The Funding Stack of an Indian NBFC

Understanding where an Indian NBFC gets its money is the fastest way to understand its fragility.

Table 6 — Funding Sources and What They Signal

Sources: Crisil Ratings securitisation reports FY26 and Q1 FY27; ICRA structured finance updates; EY Private Credit Report H2 2025.

The securitisation numbers deserve emphasis. FY26 volumes hit a record ₹2.55 trillion on a 30% rise in NBFC originations that offset the near-total withdrawal of banks — whose share fell from 26% to 3% in one year. Q1 FY27 came in at ₹600 billion, +22% YoY, with over 98% NBFC-originated. ICRA noted a behavioural shift: lenders taking a more risk-averse view of certain originators now prefer the securitisation route over on-balance-sheet funding.

Read that carefully. Sophisticated domestic lenders are increasingly unwilling to take unsecured corporate risk on mid-market NBFCs, and are instead buying ring-fenced pools of the same NBFCs' loans. A foreign investor arriving with unsecured balance-sheet exposure is taking a risk the best-informed local participants are actively structuring around.

Major Players and Investment Activity

Disclosure quality is high by emerging-market standards: NBFC-ULs face bank-equivalent disclosure and mandatory listing, and most significant lenders are rated by Crisil, ICRA, India Ratings or CARE.

Table 7 — Market Map

Note: Upper Layer names are drawn from the RBI's published NBFC-UL list for 2024-25. Inclusion is not an endorsement or a comment on creditworthiness.

Private credit deal activity

• CY2025: USD 12.4 billion across 166 transactions, +35% on CY2024 (~USD 9.2bn) — EY Private Credit Report. H2 2025 alone was USD 3.4 billion.
• Real estate was 42% of H2 2025 deal value, followed by healthcare and industrials at 15% each.
• Domestic funds accounted for over 64% of deal value and 69% of volume — a genuinely deepening onshore ecosystem, and a competitive fact for offshore entrants.
• EY projects India private credit AUM at USD 60–70 billion by 2028.

Kilde view: the most durable Indian non-bank models have one of three moats — physical last-mile distribution that cannot be replicated digitally (gold, used vehicle, rural MSME); a collateral type with a short, tested enforcement path; or a proprietary underwriting dataset in a segment banks structurally cannot serve. Lenders whose entire advantage is a customer-acquisition channel do not survive the next funding squeeze.

Market Risks and Regulatory Trends

1. Currency and Macro Risks

2. Credit Risk — The Distribution, Not the Average

Under the RBI's severe credit stress scenario applied to 174 NBFCs: aggregate CRAR falls from 22.8% to 20.9%, GNPA rises from 2.3% to 5.4%, eleven NBFCs fall below the 15% minimum CRAR requirement, and up to seven face negative liquidity mismatches exceeding 20% of outflows. The RBI also warned that even as headline GNPA declined, fresh NPA accretions were trending higher and write-offs growing.

Specific concerns: gold price correlation (a book at 85% LTV against a sharply appreciated metal carries portfolio-wide correlated collateral risk); unsecured business loans, untested through a genuine downturn; household debt, explicitly flagged in the June 2026 Financial Stability Report; and concentration — the Upper Layer captures a handful of very large institutions while the mid-market tier is fragmented and individually fragile.

3. Regulatory and Legal Risks

4. Funding Risk and Outlook

NBFCs are wholesale-funded by construction, so when conditions tighten they tighten for non-banks first — FY26 demonstrated this in miniature.

The single most informative diligence question about an Indian NBFC is not what it lends against. It is how many distinct, independently motivated funding sources it has, and what happens to each of them in a stress month.

• Short term: funding stays tight for the mid-market tier; monsoon and oil dominate the rural credit picture through FY27.
• Medium term: the ₹1 trillion Upper Layer threshold and rising compliance costs drive consolidation; survivors are better capitalised and better disclosed.
• Long term: India settles into a two-tier non-bank market — a small, bank-like systemically significant group plus a formalised specialist tier that private credit can underwrite with confidence.

{{cta-component}}

Opportunities for Private Credit Investors in India

India offers a rare combination: institutional-grade legal infrastructure, world-class credit data, an active prudential supervisor, spreads well above developed-market non-bank credit, and — since February 2026 — a cross-border framework that no longer caps what a foreign lender can charge.

Table 8 — Entry Routes and Indicative Return Spectrum

This table is deliberately directional rather than numeric. Indian NBFC pricing varies materially by external rating, tenor, security package and issuer size, and 2026 has been volatile for both the rate cycle and the rupee. Any indicative yield quoted without matching hedging cost, tenor and rating assumptions is not a usable number. Model the FX overlay — currently ~2.8–3.0% annualised on a twelve-month hedge — as a primary line item, not a footnote.

Mitigating Factors

• A single, capable prudential supervisor with a demonstrated willingness to intervene early.
• Four credit bureaus plus Aadhaar, GST and Account Aggregator data — underwriting visibility most emerging markets cannot offer.
• Mandatory listing and bank-equivalent disclosure for Upper Layer counterparties.
• Established enforcement machinery in the SARFAESI Act and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code — functional, if slow.
• A structural funding gap of ₹4.1–4.3 trillion in FY27 alone that domestic banks are visibly not filling.

How India Compares

Table 9 — India in Context

Sources: Kilde market analyses; RBI; national regulators. Figures are latest available and not always as of the same date.

Interpretation. India is not the highest-yielding market Kilde covers. It is the one where scale, data quality, supervisory competence and — as of 2026 — cross-border access line up simultaneously. The trade-off is currency, and that trade-off is currently cheaper to neutralise than it has been in years.

Conclusion

India's non-bank lending sector is large, well-supervised, structurally funding-constrained, and — for the first time in over a decade — genuinely open to foreign private credit at commercial pricing. The scale is ₹48–50 trillion of NBFC AUM growing 18–19%, against an incremental retail funding requirement of ₹4.1–4.3 trillion in FY27 that domestic banks are not meeting. The February 2026 ECB overhaul removed the three provisions — the cost cap, the lender residency test and the on-lending restriction — that had made high-yield offshore lending into Indian NBFCs unworkable.

The risks are real and mostly not credit risks. The rupee hit an all-time low in May 2026. Oil above USD 100 widens the external deficit by 140–190 bps of GDP. The FY27 monsoon is forecast below normal, landing directly on rural borrower cash flows. State legislatures can disrupt a lending segment without touching the RBI rulebook. And the RBI's own stress tests put eleven NBFCs below minimum capital under severe stress, even as the sector aggregate looks robust.

India rewards selectivity more than conviction. The market is deep enough that an investor does not need to take the marginal counterparty to get deployed, and volatile enough that taking it will eventually be punished. The opportunity is real; the diligence standard has to match it.

About Kilde

At Kilde, we specialise in secured private credit — and that is all we do.

Kilde is a regulated investment platform that helps accredited investors earn a predictable monthly income through high-yield, senior-secured private credit. We deal exclusively with licensed non-bank financial institutions that have a proven track record and strong financial performance. Each borrower is rigorously vetted using Kilde's proprietary credit scoring model, which analyses over 20 million data points on loans and repayments to ensure that only the most reliable counterparties receive funding.

Our investments typically have a maturity of 3 to 36 months, with collateral coverage exceeding 100%. Monthly cash coupons provide predictable income, while an early redemption option on select deals (typically on a rolling 3-month cycle) offers additional flexibility.

Strict financial covenants protect investor capital throughout the loan tenure, including limits on leverage ratios, interest coverage and repayment rates. Continuous monitoring of financial statements and borrower performance helps mitigate risk, while structured loan agreements under Singapore law provide a strong legal framework for enforcement.

Kilde bridges the traditional trade-off between wealth preservation and growth. Where conventional fixed income forces a choice between low-risk, low-return safety and higher-risk, higher-return vehicles, Kilde's private credit model delivers both: strong yields with disciplined risk management.

{{cta-component}}

Sources

1. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. Provisional Estimates of National Income 2025-26. New Delhi: MoSPI, 5 June 2026.
2. Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. New Series of Gross Domestic Product Estimates with Base Year 2022-23. New Delhi: MoSPI, February 2026.
3. Reserve Bank of India. Monetary Policy Statement, 5 June 2026, and Monetary Policy Statement, October 2025.
4. Reserve Bank of India. Financial Stability Report, June 2026, and Financial Stability Report, December 2025.
5. Reserve Bank of India. Foreign Exchange Management (Borrowing and Lending) (First Amendment) Regulations, 2026, notified 9 February 2026.
6. Reserve Bank of India. A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 23, 18 February 2026 (revised ECB reporting formats).
7. Reserve Bank of India. A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 21, 19 February 2026 (VRR subsumed under the General Route from 1 April 2026).
8. Reserve Bank of India. Investments by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities through the General Route – Relaxations, 8 May 2025.
9. Reserve Bank of India. Scale Based Regulation: A Revised Regulatory Framework for NBFCs, 22 October 2021, and NBFCs (Registration, Exemptions and Framework for Scale Based Regulation) Directions, 2025, as amended with effect from 1 July 2026.
10. Reserve Bank of India. NBFC Upper Layer list for 2024-25, 16 January 2025.
11. Reserve Bank of India. Digital Lending Directions, 2025, 8 May 2025.
12. Reserve Bank of India. Co-Lending Arrangements Directions, 2025 (DoR.STR.REC.44/13.07.010/2025-26), 6 August 2025.
13. Reserve Bank of India. Lending against gold collateral framework, 2025; key provisions effective 1 April 2026.
14. Reserve Bank of India. Master Direction – Regulatory Framework for Microfinance Loans, March 2022.
15. Crisil Ratings. AUM to tick up steadily for NBFCs, cross Rs 50 lakh crore next fiscal, November 2025; Securitisation volumes FY26, April 2026; Q1 FY27 securitisation update, July 2026; Profitability of gold-loan NBFCs, 2026; NBFC vehicle-loan AUM to reach ₹11 trillion by FY27, December 2025.
16. ICRA. Non-banking Financial Companies, January 2026, and ICRA structured finance updates, 2025–26.
17. MFIN. Micrometer, 57th Edition (Q4 FY 2025-26) and Q2 FY 2025-26.
18. CRIF High Mark. How India Lends, May 2026; Experian and Equifax retail credit updates, Q4 FY26; TransUnion CIBIL Credit Market Indicator, 2026.
19. EY India. Private Credit Report H2 2025; RBI Gold Loan Guidelines 2025: Key changes and impact; RBI has revised the borrowing and lending framework, March 2026.
20. Government of India / NCGTC. Credit Guarantee Scheme for Microfinance Institutions 2.0, launched 20 March 2026, extended to 31 August 2026.
21. Karnataka Micro Finance (Prevention of Coercive Actions) Ordinance, 2025.
22. Market forward-premium data, USD/INR twelve-month curve, June–July 2026.